US Condemns Attacks on HKN's Sarsang Field as KRG Cries Economic Terrorism
Washington and London denounced a week of drone strikes on Kurdistan's oil fields after American operator HKN Energy shut down its Sarsang facility, with the regional government calling the campaign an act of terrorism.

An explosive drone slammed into a production facility at the Sarsang oil field in Duhok province around 7 a.m. on Tuesday, touching off a fire and forcing HKN Energy, the Texas-based operator, to halt production. No one was hurt. The rest of the damage was strategic. Within hours the United States had publicly condemned the strike, the Kurdistan Regional Government had branded it terrorism, and a chunk of the region's oil output had gone dark.
Sarsang was not an isolated hit. It was the third field in three days to take a drone, part of a coordinated campaign that ran from July 14 to July 16 and knocked out a large share of the Kurdistan Region's petroleum production. The message to the international companies drilling in northern Iraq was blunt: your infrastructure is a target, and no one is going to be held to account for hitting it.
Three days, five fields, one American operator down
The sequence started on July 14, when two drones struck the Khurmala field near Erbil and a third explosive drone was shot down close to Erbil International Airport. Khurmala took material damage, including to a water pipeline. The next morning came Sarsang, operated by HKN Energy, one of a handful of US firms with money in the ground in Kurdistan. HKN said operations at the affected facility would be suspended "until the site is secured and a full evaluation is completed." On July 16, drones hit fields operated by Norway's DNO ASA at Tawke and Peshkabir, and DNO temporarily suspended production at two of its sites.
Across the wave, the numbers were consistent from field to field: no casualties, personnel accounted for, and facilities offline. That last part is what mattered on the ledger. Whoever launched these drones was not trying to kill workers. They were trying to shut down output, and they succeeded.
What Washington and London actually said
The US Embassy in Baghdad moved first, on July 15, condemning "the recent drone attacks throughout Iraq, including the July 14 and July 15 drone attacks on critical infrastructure at the Khormala and Sarsang oil fields in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region." In a separate line aimed squarely at Baghdad, the embassy called the strikes "unacceptable," said they "undermine Iraq's sovereignty," and warned they "hurt Iraq's efforts to attract foreign investment." It urged the federal government to stop "armed actors from launching these attacks against sites within its own territory."
Three days later, on July 18, the British Embassy in Baghdad followed with its own statement, saying the UK "condemns the recent drone attacks across Iraq, including those this week targeting energy infrastructure in the KRI." Two of the largest Western embassies in Iraq pointing at the same problem in the same week is not routine diplomatic housekeeping. It is a signal that foreign capital in Kurdistan now sees itself under fire.
The KRG's terrorism charge
The Kurdistan Region's Ministry of Natural Resources did not hedge. It said it "strongly condemns and denounces these acts of terrorism against the Kurdistan Region's vital economic infrastructure." The framing is deliberate. Calling drone strikes on oil fields terrorism, rather than sabotage or a security incident, puts the attacks in the same category as the militia violence that has plagued Iraq for a decade, and it pressures Baghdad to treat the perpetrators as such.
KRG officials have been clearer in private about who they blame. They point at Iran-aligned factions inside the Hashd al-Shaabi, the Popular Mobilization Forces, a body that is nominally part of the Iraqi state. Earlier in the month, on July 3, Kurdish authorities blamed the Hashd for a downed drone near Erbil airport. Baghdad rejected that accusation. No group has claimed responsibility for the July field strikes, and the identity of the attackers has not been publicly established. What is not in dispute is the timing: the attacks intensified after the 12-day Israel-Iran conflict, a stretch when Iran-backed groups across the region became more active.
The barrels that stopped moving
The industry put a figure on the damage that the diplomatic statements avoided. The Association of the Petroleum Industry of Kurdistan, APIKUR, whose members include HKN, DNO and Hunt, said the majority of its members had suspended production totaling more than 200,000 barrels per day. KRG officials cited the same rough number. By some estimates that amounted to as much as two-thirds of the region's oil output going offline in the span of three days.
That is a serious hit for a region that has been fighting to keep its energy sector solvent. The main export route, the pipeline to Turkey's Ceyhan port, has been shut since 2023, leaving producers dependent on smaller domestic sales and trucking. Layer a militia drone campaign on top of a closed export pipeline and the economics for foreign operators start to look ugly. Every day Sarsang and the DNO fields stay down is revenue that does not arrive and a risk premium that does not fall.
A proxy fight over money, fought with drones
Strip away the explosions and this is a fight about who controls Kurdistan's oil revenue. Erbil and Baghdad have been at odds for years over export earnings, budget transfers and the legal status of the KRG's contracts with international companies. In May, the federal government filed a complaint against the KRG over gas deals signed with US firms, including HKN Energy. Two months later, HKN's field is on fire.
The drone campaign reads as leverage in that dispute, applied by actors who benefit from keeping Western companies nervous and Kurdish autonomy expensive. The pattern is consistent: hit the economic infrastructure, avoid casualties, claim nothing, and let the ambiguity do the political work. It is deniable pressure, and so far it has cost the attackers nothing.
The condemnations from Washington and London matter, but statements do not defend oil fields. Until Baghdad demonstrates it can or will stop armed groups operating on its own soil, the calculation for HKN and its peers gets harder. Foreign investment follows security, not press releases. For now, the drones have shown they can shut down a US-operated field in a single morning, and no one has been made to answer for it. That is the real damage from the week Sarsang burned.
Sources
https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2025/07/18/us-uk-condemn-drone-attacks-targeting-energy-sites-in-iraqs-kurdistan-region/https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2025/07/us-uk-condemn-drone-attacks-targeting-energy-sites-in-iraqs-kurdistan-region.phphttps://www.arabnews.com/node/2608139/middle-easthttps://kurdistanchronicle.com/babat/4033https://thearabweekly.com/pro-iran-militias-drone-strikes-shut-oilfields-iraqi-kurdistan-cut-output-150000-bpdhttps://www.hrw.org/news/2025/07/29/iraq-damage-to-kurdistan-region-oil-fields-puts-rights-at-risk